Fusebox 5
January 23, 2006 · 13 Comments
Work on the next generation Fusebox application framework is just about to begin. Hal and John have asked me to put together a small team to work on Fusebox 5 and we've been discussing the overall guidelines for this new version. This is primarily an architectural release - we're aiming for backward-compatibility with Fusebox 4.1 - but looking to rebuild the core files to make future maintenance easier. That's not to say there won't be new features in Fusebox 5 but I want to set the expectation that this is not going to be a free-for-all expansion of the framework.
Fusebox 4.1 is a very stable, mature framework that has a lot of powerful features. There are some limitations in the current grammar which I'd like to see addressed in Fusebox 5 and a few areas where I'd like to see some increased functionality. Fusebox 5 for ColdFusion will take advantage of CFCs to provide a more structured, more easily maintained set of core files. That is about all that has been decided so far.
If you'd like to discuss your vision of Fusebox and your desires for the future of the framework, please feel free to join the Fusebox 5 mailing list. The core development team will be very small initially and when we feel comfortable with the new code base, we will extend an alpha testing invitation to a slightly larger (but, again, relatively small) group of Fuseboxers and gradually expand from there.
Tags: coldfusion · fusebox

13 responses so far ↓
1 Roger Lancefield // Jan 23, 2006 at 5:27 PM
2 Sami Hoda // Jan 23, 2006 at 5:57 PM
3 Mike Tangorre // Jan 23, 2006 at 6:30 PM
4 Mike Brunt // Jan 23, 2006 at 7:15 PM
5 Mark Drew // Jan 24, 2006 at 12:41 AM
MD
6 Damien // Jan 24, 2006 at 6:38 AM
7 Sean Corfield // Jan 24, 2006 at 7:18 AM
8 Stephen Cassady // Jan 24, 2006 at 12:13 PM
9 Mike Tangorre // Jan 25, 2006 at 5:35 AM
Who approves access to the FB5 mailing list? I know a couple of us have signed up but got the "pending approval" message. I was just curious as to who is determining who gets access..
Thanks!
Mike
10 Roger Lancefield // Jan 25, 2006 at 6:06 AM
I'm sure once the list maintainer has finished his or her real work for the day, they'll find time to approve the next batch of sign-ups.
11 Sean Corfield // Jan 25, 2006 at 9:44 AM
12 Sami Hoda // Jan 25, 2006 at 9:53 AM
13 Sean Corfield // Jan 25, 2006 at 10:33 AM
Leave a Comment